Trump Suddenly Embraces Impeachment . . . of a Federal Judge

Avatar

Trump’s beef? (1) Judge Boasberg was appointed by President Obama, (2) Judge Boasberg did not perform better that Trump in the 2024 election, (3) Judge Boasberg is a crooked judge, “a troublemaker and agitator,” and, as a consequence, the judge ought to be impeached, primarily for doing his job and interpreting the law in a manner consistent with precedent.

The rule of law laid down in judicial impeachment cases has been that judges cannot be removed for decisions that the president disagrees with. Impeachment of judges is an unlikely event in American history: 15 judges have been impeached, 8 convicted and removed. Impeachment and removal has ranged from intoxication on the bench, to abandoning the office and joining the Confederacy, to various types of corruption, and to perjury and income tax evasion, all of which arguably fit the normal impeachment standard of high crimes and misdemeanors for executive branch impeachments.*

* [But see this for more complete background: within the judicial branch “good behavior” clause of Article 3, there may be some argument that Trumpists may make to the effect that Judge Boasberg violated the good behavior clause (believe it or not) by simply ruling against Trump. The background of this good behavior clause makes it unrealistic to believe that such an argument would be considered as anything other than frivolous, however.]

In any event, the important conclusion in this crucial case is that Trump’s reaction shows clearly (1) his complete lack of basic understanding of the American constitutional system, particularly the judiciary, and (2) his knee jerk reaction to pulverize the reputation of any judge that disciplines him, (3) his utter contempt – utter demented contempt – for law, in general, and anything untoward that affects him adversely, and (4) his descent into uncontrolled all caps madness unlike anything witnessed in his first presidential term.

This battle between Trump administration and the courts represents, potentially, the most important on display since without Trump accepting court rulings the American government loses its principal foundation, judicial supremacy in judicial matters. Absent that, the jungle awaits . . .

__________________

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Given the highly unusual statement by the Chief Justice, its import cannot be underestimated. We’ll likely see, in its wake, MAGA world completely “cancel” the Chief Justice, and Trump say something that makes the situation worse.

This is important. Stay tuned.

Chuck Schumer Needs a Spine Transplant . . .

Senate Minority Leader showed up in his invertebrate form for the battle over the GOP-led continuing resolution to fund the government through most of the remaining year. He has often railed about the possible collapse of democracy under Trump’s presidency, loudly trashing the GOP for their draconian plans to anyone who has a microphone. Nonetheless, actual tactical follow-up to his righteous indignation has rarely followed. He slithers away from a real fight and by now represents the ghost of a Democratic party long hobbled by bipartisanship and, frankly, fear of incivility, a decades old Democratic disability. His latest was his codging together enough Democratic senators’ votes to pass the GOP continuing resolution granting Trump with a carte blanche for chaos for the rest of the fiscal year. It’s what happens when you bring a Schumer to a knife fight.

MSNBC’s The Weekend‘s Symone Sanders-Townsend laid it on in her inimitable style:

Does the Senate Democratic caucus have enough senators with spines to (finally) do what is needed and dethrone their minority leader? It’s long past time to do so. Pick a fighter, for example, Arizona’s Mark Kelly, Maryland’s Chris Van Hollen, Massachusetts’ Elizabeth Warren, or Rhode Island’s Sheldon Whitehouse. Put a tiger in your tank, and ditch the civility.

We Told You So, No. 002

This is the second in what will be a regular feature (see our first post here). It’s based upon what is known as the original position fallacy:

This, of course, was predictable for the average MAGA voter, they were warned many times that Trump & Company had no true regard for their own supporters (except their mega wealthy cabal). Cheering on all of Trump’s plans the MAGA crowd were looking forward to the firing huge swathes of our federal workforce according to the Project 2025 playbook. And without thought of consequences these MAGAs failed to take notice that there are many MAGA adherents in that federal workforce. Thinking things through is not one of the characteristics of the entire MAGA movement, from top to bottom.

So, now, just seven weeks into the Re-Trumping of America, thousands of federal workers have been summarily laid off and RIFed. Those MAGAs who have been directly or indirectly harmed by this have learned the lesson of the original position fallacy. And more lessons will be forthcoming to MAGAs who disproportionately rely on programs being axed by the GOP/MAGA, for instance, Medicaid, administration interference with Social Security and Medicare, and the decimation of the Veterans Administration.

So, here’s is today’s example of buyer’s regret, courtesy of Twitter/X poster Tim Hannon’s retweet of a February 6th cris de coeur from MAGA town:

The Man Is Insane, Trump’s New Moves Against Canada

Trump’s latest Truth Social rant is among the more unhinged of both of his presidencies. It showcases grand mal psychological instability as well as a mind suffering peak megalomania while demonstrating rank stupidity. The original Dunning Kruger starting point.

For example, neither sane nor savvy is to send out this mentally disoriented message into the teeth of a financial market downturn. But who is there in the administration – a collection of incompetent conspiracy operatives – to stop him? The markets were down sharply this morning already prior to his announcement. We’ll see how they end the day – no predicting market players who may be so confused that they signal they like Trump’s thinking . . . Go figure.

In any event, here’s his maximally deranged rant, a rant of many levels and promising many catastrophes, all based on utter tariff stupidity and unearned bravado, and incredibly brazen threats to “absorb” Canada as out “cherished” 51st state:

We’ll wait and see about today’s financial markets’ results, but realistically, I expect continuing losses throughout the day, unless traders are struck dumb. . . and daft.

Later on I’ll have a look at the other unhinged ideas and threats he introduced in his Truth Social post. . .

Trump Bumbles and Fumbles After Shocking Oval Office Zelensky Meeting

After scolding Ukraine’s Zelensky in the Oval Office and then punishing Ukraine by cutting off U.S. intelligence data, threatening to remove thousands of Ukrainians from the U.S., and stalling military assistance, Trump is now, just an hour ago, threatening Russia with sanctions for waging an aggressive bombing campaign.

Yesterday, he posted this on TruthSocial:

“Based on the fact that Russia is absolutely ‘pounding’ Ukraine on the battlefield right now, I am strongly considering large scale Banking Sanctions, Sanctions, and Tariffs on Russia until a Cease Fire and FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ON PEACE IS REACHED. To Russia and Ukraine, get to the table right now, before it is too late. Thank you!!!”

This stepped up aggression by Russia is a case of cause-effect based upon Trump’s own recent treatment of Ukraine, the literal cutting off of most aid to Ukraine following the February 28th Oval Office fiasco. Basically, Trump’s post-meeting abandonment of Ukraine made it possible for Russia to do the Ukrainian battlefield “pounding” by removing, for example, Ukraine’s access to U.S. military surveillance thereby allowing Russia to immediately lambaste Ukraine at will. Cause-Effect. When will his madcap foreign policies do the same, and how dangerous will be the result?

Why the Ultra-Wealthy Need More Tax Breaks

Today, CNN reported: “When it comes to the rise of multimillionaires, the United States is leading the charge, a new report found. The number of high-net worth individuals — or those with assets worth more than $10 million — rose 4.4% worldwide in 2024, to 2,341,378, but jumped 5.2% in North America, according to the annual Wealth Report by global real estate consultancy Knight Frank. The U.S. is now home to almost 40% of the world’s super rich, the report estimates  nearly double the share that resides in China, the region with the next highest contingent of wealthy individuals.”

The report points out as well that “Future wealth creation, especially in the ultra-wealthy (US$100 million+) segment, is likely to be subject to a more activist regulatory and tax response.” In plain English, wealth growth, under the Trump administration, will likely result in an “activist regulatory and tax response,” i.e., a super-wealthy person’s way of saying, “More tax breaks and less regulations!! For us!”

And, of course, being in a competitive society, the growth rate of super-wealthy families must hold on to its leadership position. Rooting against them would be Un-American!! The chart below shows just how hard it is to stay in the top 1%; there are so many 99%ers grasping cravenly at their fortunes: 85 million other families, versus 2.5 million super-wealthy. A very unfair fight. How is it that such a small contingent has been able to dominate so many millions of families? Hmmmmm…

USAID Attacked Relentlessly

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been oppressively besieged since the arrival of Elon Musk, Trump’s hatchet man. One of the results among the many agencies under attack is the stifling of public communications, including shutting information about the agency on the agency websites. Presently, USAID’s website consists of one page which sounds like a death knell, and it very likely is. Note the final sentence, “Thank you for your service.” Indeed. . .

On Friday, February 7, 2025, at 11:59 pm (EST) all USAID direct hire personnel will be placed on administrative leave globally, with the exception of designated personnel responsible for mission-critical functions, core leadership and specially designated programs. Essential personnel expected to continue working will be informed by Agency leadership by Thursday, February 6, at 3:00pm (EST).

For USAID personnel currently posted outside the United States, the Agency, in coordination with missions and the Department of State, is currently preparing a plan, in accordance with all applicable requirements and laws, under which the Agency would arrange and pay for return travel to the United States within 30 days and provide for the termination of PSC and ISC contracts that are not determined to be essential. The Agency will consider case-by-case exceptions and return travel extensions based on personal or family hardship, mobility or safety concerns, or other reasons. For example, the Agency will consider exceptions based on the timing of dependents’ school term, personal or familial medical needs, pregnancy, and other reasons. Further guidance on how to request an exception will be forthcoming.

Thank you for your service.

Trump’s Tariff Grift: Canada

Yesterday, Trump levied a worldwide 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports to the U.S.! Yes, the entire world. Most notably Canada, Mexico, both of them our longstanding allies and fellow NAFTA partners. It happens; it happened. It affects 21 Million tons of steel products; our 2023 supply of steel sourced in the U.S. was approximately 90 Million tons, including flat-rolled, mini milled, and tubular. Imported steel goods were, therefore, 19%, a significant amount. Below, I’ll have a look at the Canadian impact, but first:

The chart below shows the world share of steel imports for 2023:

As far as aluminum is concerned, Canadian imports (2024) provided the lion’s share, outpacing all other countries.

The total amount of all imports vs. steel and aluminum imports is illustrated to the left (2024 data). The wedge shows the amount we import worldwide, Canada’s portion of the wedge is smaller than the total, of course.

Thus, Trump’s targeted steel tariffs should have but a moderate effect on overall prices, but a significant impact on steel prices, but a larger impact on aluminum. And these products are not in general, final products, they are intermediate, used in the production of final products. The price increases that will occur during Trump’s tariffs will be passed along to the American public, as higher prices, and will contribute to overall inflation, particularly in auto production costs and consumer sales of the final products. And recall how maniacally worked up Trump was about “Biden’s inflation,” which was brief and directly related to COVID’s effects. Inflation now is running between 2.5 and 3%, within the Federal Reserve’s target rate. So, what does our daft president do to bring prices down as he promised his MAGAs he would do on “day one”? Well. he slaps on tariffs – worldwide – which will accelerate inflation. Of course. Indeed.

In truth, tariffs are a mixed bag, and often they do not meet the economic objectives of the country imposing tariffs, for example, aiding the development of home grown industries. Trump, however, has since his early middle age, not gotten the message. On the record, he famously said, “Tariff is the most beautiful word in the dictionary,” and dubbed himself “Tariff Man.” He thinks its an economic nuclear weapon.

Why? He is so dull he does not accept the axiom that tariffs almost always cause price inflation! He insists that tariffs are paid by the tariffed counties; they are not, they’re paid by the importer, and then passed along through the production pipeline as a price increase at the point of sale to consumers. Where is the crater sized hole in his brain? Certainly, he’s heard from many that he is dead wrong, but who in his present administration dares tell him? Could son Barron convince him, he’s probably had some high school level economics? No, Trump is so self-destructively certain and goofily confident that he’s ultimately wholly irrational, across the board. Reasoning with him is, in any practical sense, impossible. There’s no clear definition of how addled he is. But it’s a lot.

So, I expect his tariffs will backfire as the public and business interests (such as the automobile industry) speak loud and clear. Trump will likely try to periodically soften the blow to price inflation by suddenly reducing them, and by striking deals that exempt certain industries from the tariffs, such as agriculture and automobiles. This, of course will defeat the reason for tariffs. He’ll play at tariffs like a boy with a yoyo – up and down, in and out. In doing so he’ll cause massive economic uncertainty that may paralyze whole industries trying to plan their business choices. And this level of uncertainty is anathema to producing a stable economy, and stability is the holy grail of commerce. Trump’s yoyo grift is the tool of a boy, not a man. Certainly not a tariff man . . .

Canada Tariffs – Democratic Senators Introduce Legislation to Curb Trump’s Enthusiasm for Tariffs

Two days before Trump placed a 25% tariff on nearly all goods from Canada (he placed a 10% tariff on energy and energy resources), Senators Coons (DE) and Kaine (VA) introduced legislation sure to raise Trump’s blood pressure. It’s a bill to restrict a president’s authority to impose tariffs on allies and free trade agreement partners by requiring the consent of Congress. Presently, presidents’ tariff authority is so strong as to be arguably plenary.

Here’s the joint statement by Coons and Kaine. Note that it was introduced two days before the tariffs were imposed. Chances for passage in a MAGA dominated House? Very iffy. . .

Trump’s Tariff on Canada – A Shot Glass Example of Canadian Retaliation

The Liquor Control Board of Ontario quickly addressed Trump’s 25% tariff on Canadian products, one of our staunchest allies. It is also a major trading partner from whom we imported $462 Billion in 2023, the year with the most complete data. Here’s what we imported, second only to Mexico. So, we’re talking 25% tax on American importers, that’s a very high tariff rate, which due to NAFTA, was approximately 2%. Now, we’re in a new world where an inept businessman is permitted to impose tariffs willy-nilly.

In any event, here’s an example of how quickly the Canadian Province of Ontario replied to Trump today. (The Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) is a government agency. It is a Crown agency that is owned by the Ontario provincial government. The LCBO is responsible for the sale and distribution of alcohol in Ontario.). The Premier of Ontario, the wonderfully cantankerous Doug Ford posted this on Twitter/X:

Assuredly, more will follow, and recall that the automobile business is a tripartite arrangement among us, Canada and Mexico. We may see price increases on cars very soon (like tomorrow), So, if you can, buy a new car today. . .