The Man Is Insane, Trump’s New Moves Against Canada

Trump’s latest Truth Social rant is among the more unhinged of both of his presidencies. It showcases grand mal psychological instability as well as a mind suffering peak megalomania while demonstrating rank stupidity. The original Dunning Kruger starting point.

For example, neither sane nor savvy is to send out this mentally disoriented message into the teeth of a financial market downturn. But who is there in the administration – a collection of incompetent conspiracy operatives – to stop him? The markets were down sharply this morning already prior to his announcement. We’ll see how they end the day – no predicting market players who may be so confused that they signal they like Trump’s thinking . . . Go figure.

In any event, here’s his maximally deranged rant, a rant of many levels and promising many catastrophes, all based on utter tariff stupidity and unearned bravado, and incredibly brazen threats to “absorb” Canada as out “cherished” 51st state:

We’ll wait and see about today’s financial markets’ results, but realistically, I expect continuing losses throughout the day, unless traders are struck dumb. . . and daft.

Later on I’ll have a look at the other unhinged ideas and threats he introduced in his Truth Social post. . .

Trump, the Futurist

Trump 1.0 and during his 2021-2025 “vacation” never missed an opportunity to directly blame President Biden for any significant financial market sell offs despite the fact that, for example, the S&P 500’s growth rate under Democrats is 10% compared with 6.7% under Republicans. Trump posted on True Social in July 2020: “If you want your 401k’s and stocks…to disintegrate and disappear, vote for the Radical Left Do Nothing Democrats and Corrupt Joe Biden,” In reality, reported CNN, “with Biden in the White House, the US stock market not only preserved those Trump-era gains, but generated even more massive ones for millions of Americans’ 401(k) plans, nest eggs and college savings plans.”

But now with the markets lately off by significant percentage points, Trump is now apparently has changed, he’s now Future Man! Stock market? Schmockmarket! Just wait a few years, it’ll come back. Here’s what he told FOX News’ Maria Bartiromo, on a show called – speaking of the future – Sunday Morning Futures. Introducing Future Man . . .

BARTIROMO: Before you came into the Oval Office the first time, you were a very successful businessman, very successful real estate executive. And a lot of people said, oh, this is the business president. This is it. He’s watching the stock market. He knows all about — he doesn’t want the market to go down. And now we have got tariffs, and the market has been going down.

TRUMP: Well, not much, I mean, in all fairness, not much.

BARTIROMO: You said, look, we’re going to have a disruption, but we’re OK with that. Is that what you meant? The stock market going down was the disruption?

TRUMP: There will be a little disruption.

BARTIROMO: What other disruption were you alluding to?

TRUMP: Look, what I have to do is build a strong country. You can’t really watch the stock market. If you look at China, they have a 100-year perspective. We have a quarter. We go by quarters.

BARTIROMO: That’s true.

TRUMP: And you can’t go by that. You have to do what’s right. What we’re doing is, we’re building a tremendous foundation for the future, tremendous foundation. Everything’s been taken away. We don’t make ships anymore.

Why the Ultra-Wealthy Need More Tax Breaks

Today, CNN reported: “When it comes to the rise of multimillionaires, the United States is leading the charge, a new report found. The number of high-net worth individuals — or those with assets worth more than $10 million — rose 4.4% worldwide in 2024, to 2,341,378, but jumped 5.2% in North America, according to the annual Wealth Report by global real estate consultancy Knight Frank. The U.S. is now home to almost 40% of the world’s super rich, the report estimates  nearly double the share that resides in China, the region with the next highest contingent of wealthy individuals.”

The report points out as well that “Future wealth creation, especially in the ultra-wealthy (US$100 million+) segment, is likely to be subject to a more activist regulatory and tax response.” In plain English, wealth growth, under the Trump administration, will likely result in an “activist regulatory and tax response,” i.e., a super-wealthy person’s way of saying, “More tax breaks and less regulations!! For us!”

And, of course, being in a competitive society, the growth rate of super-wealthy families must hold on to its leadership position. Rooting against them would be Un-American!! The chart below shows just how hard it is to stay in the top 1%; there are so many 99%ers grasping cravenly at their fortunes: 85 million other families, versus 2.5 million super-wealthy. A very unfair fight. How is it that such a small contingent has been able to dominate so many millions of families? Hmmmmm…

Trump’s Tariff Grift: Canada

Yesterday, Trump levied a worldwide 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports to the U.S.! Yes, the entire world. Most notably Canada, Mexico, both of them our longstanding allies and fellow NAFTA partners. It happens; it happened. It affects 21 Million tons of steel products; our 2023 supply of steel sourced in the U.S. was approximately 90 Million tons, including flat-rolled, mini milled, and tubular. Imported steel goods were, therefore, 19%, a significant amount. Below, I’ll have a look at the Canadian impact, but first:

The chart below shows the world share of steel imports for 2023:

As far as aluminum is concerned, Canadian imports (2024) provided the lion’s share, outpacing all other countries.

The total amount of all imports vs. steel and aluminum imports is illustrated to the left (2024 data). The wedge shows the amount we import worldwide, Canada’s portion of the wedge is smaller than the total, of course.

Thus, Trump’s targeted steel tariffs should have but a moderate effect on overall prices, but a significant impact on steel prices, but a larger impact on aluminum. And these products are not in general, final products, they are intermediate, used in the production of final products. The price increases that will occur during Trump’s tariffs will be passed along to the American public, as higher prices, and will contribute to overall inflation, particularly in auto production costs and consumer sales of the final products. And recall how maniacally worked up Trump was about “Biden’s inflation,” which was brief and directly related to COVID’s effects. Inflation now is running between 2.5 and 3%, within the Federal Reserve’s target rate. So, what does our daft president do to bring prices down as he promised his MAGAs he would do on “day one”? Well. he slaps on tariffs – worldwide – which will accelerate inflation. Of course. Indeed.

In truth, tariffs are a mixed bag, and often they do not meet the economic objectives of the country imposing tariffs, for example, aiding the development of home grown industries. Trump, however, has since his early middle age, not gotten the message. On the record, he famously said, “Tariff is the most beautiful word in the dictionary,” and dubbed himself “Tariff Man.” He thinks its an economic nuclear weapon.

Why? He is so dull he does not accept the axiom that tariffs almost always cause price inflation! He insists that tariffs are paid by the tariffed counties; they are not, they’re paid by the importer, and then passed along through the production pipeline as a price increase at the point of sale to consumers. Where is the crater sized hole in his brain? Certainly, he’s heard from many that he is dead wrong, but who in his present administration dares tell him? Could son Barron convince him, he’s probably had some high school level economics? No, Trump is so self-destructively certain and goofily confident that he’s ultimately wholly irrational, across the board. Reasoning with him is, in any practical sense, impossible. There’s no clear definition of how addled he is. But it’s a lot.

So, I expect his tariffs will backfire as the public and business interests (such as the automobile industry) speak loud and clear. Trump will likely try to periodically soften the blow to price inflation by suddenly reducing them, and by striking deals that exempt certain industries from the tariffs, such as agriculture and automobiles. This, of course will defeat the reason for tariffs. He’ll play at tariffs like a boy with a yoyo – up and down, in and out. In doing so he’ll cause massive economic uncertainty that may paralyze whole industries trying to plan their business choices. And this level of uncertainty is anathema to producing a stable economy, and stability is the holy grail of commerce. Trump’s yoyo grift is the tool of a boy, not a man. Certainly not a tariff man . . .

Canada Tariffs – Democratic Senators Introduce Legislation to Curb Trump’s Enthusiasm for Tariffs

Two days before Trump placed a 25% tariff on nearly all goods from Canada (he placed a 10% tariff on energy and energy resources), Senators Coons (DE) and Kaine (VA) introduced legislation sure to raise Trump’s blood pressure. It’s a bill to restrict a president’s authority to impose tariffs on allies and free trade agreement partners by requiring the consent of Congress. Presently, presidents’ tariff authority is so strong as to be arguably plenary.

Here’s the joint statement by Coons and Kaine. Note that it was introduced two days before the tariffs were imposed. Chances for passage in a MAGA dominated House? Very iffy. . .

Trump’s Tariff on Canada – A Shot Glass Example of Canadian Retaliation

The Liquor Control Board of Ontario quickly addressed Trump’s 25% tariff on Canadian products, one of our staunchest allies. It is also a major trading partner from whom we imported $462 Billion in 2023, the year with the most complete data. Here’s what we imported, second only to Mexico. So, we’re talking 25% tax on American importers, that’s a very high tariff rate, which due to NAFTA, was approximately 2%. Now, we’re in a new world where an inept businessman is permitted to impose tariffs willy-nilly.

In any event, here’s an example of how quickly the Canadian Province of Ontario replied to Trump today. (The Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) is a government agency. It is a Crown agency that is owned by the Ontario provincial government. The LCBO is responsible for the sale and distribution of alcohol in Ontario.). The Premier of Ontario, the wonderfully cantankerous Doug Ford posted this on Twitter/X:

Assuredly, more will follow, and recall that the automobile business is a tripartite arrangement among us, Canada and Mexico. We may see price increases on cars very soon (like tomorrow), So, if you can, buy a new car today. . .

Trump Slaps Tariffs on Colombia for Refusing to Accept U.S. Deportation Flights

“These measures are just the beginning,” Trump threatened in a post on Truth Social.
“We will not allow the Colombian Government to violate its legal obligations with regard
to the acceptance and return of the Criminals they forced into the United States!”

President Trump – Rapacious Maximus – just punished Colombia for its failure to permit US military aircraft to land and offload our deported immigrants. Colombia’s sovereignty – although a foundational international foundation – was unsurprisingly ignored by Trump’s outburst of venom. He immediately impose a 25% tariff on all Colombian goods, and threatened to raise it to 50% within one week. He did not discuss the inflationary impact on U.S. consumers that this tariff will have on a number of consumer products. After often centering his campaign message on Biden’s inlation, it appears that is in his rear view mirror. . .

There’s much more to learn about this breaking news here and here, including other sanctions placed on Columbia, announcing at the end of his madman dictator’s message that this is only the beginning of U.S. disfavor, and stating that Colombia, by exercising its sovereignty, “violated its legal obligations with regard to the acceptance and return of the Criminals they forced into the United States!” What legal obligations, indeed? We’ll see. . .

In any event, here are the top 10 Colombian imports for 2023 (to see the long list see here). Though a small proportion of these items when viewed on the basis of total dollar value of all foreign imports, for Colombia a 25% tariff (and possibly a 50% tariff) will hurt, and for U.S. consumers should the tariffs might cause price rises in certain items sourced exclusively by Colombia. Finally, how long can Colombia hold out?

United States Imports from ColombiaValueYear
Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products$7.19B2023
Pearls, precious stones, metals, coins$1.86B2023
Live trees, plants, bulbs, roots, cut flowers$1.57B2023
Coffee, tea, mate and spices$1.42B2023
Commodities not specified according to kind$672.77M2023
Aluminum$637.48M2023
Edible fruits, nuts, peel of citrus fruit, melons$422.14M2023
Electrical, electronic equipment$296.99M2023
Miscellaneous edible preparations$232.35M2023
Plastics$219.92M2023

Trump, Cannot Sell Shares in Trump Media (DJT) . . . Yet . . .

“Market watchers have debated whether Trump would sell shares, with some suggesting an exit could indicate he is prioritizing personal profits and alienating loyal followers who have poured money into the stock.” Barron’s, Trump Media Shares Soar After Trump Says ‘I’m Not Selling’, September 13, 2024.

“No, I’m not selling… I don’t want to sell my shares. I don’t need money… I absolutely have no intention of selling.” Donald Trump, Twitter, September 13, 2024

Trump’s assurances have a poor track record, as we know. This particular assurance to not sell shares in his Trump Media stock will be severely tested as of next Thursday, September 19. Here’s why.

Firstly, his assertion that he won’t sell his shares because he “doesn’t need money” is untrue. Trump always needs money; he’s always been raising money to, for example, fend off bankruptcy of his casinos in the 1990s. And now? Civil judgments against him, and tthe legal bills accompanying them are in the neighborhood of $600 million. In addition, financing his appeals of various legal actions against him by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith and others cost tens of millions of dollars. Many of these bills are being paid for not ot of his own pocket but by the RNC which is run by his daughter-is-law Lara Trump which has led to a short fall of donated funds available to his presidential campaign. So, yes, he needs money.

Secondly, he doesn’t care who he fleeces to raise money. In fact, he’s been trying to fleece the MAGA herd since day one. And, conveniently, they keep coming back for more. This is a guy who has sold his supporters digital trading cards, gold colored sneakers, and commemorative coins. So, despite the fact that a goodly number of those supporters have invested in DJT, he’ll not hesitate to fleece them by, for instance, selling large lots of shares and thereby causing the price to fall, perhaps causing a large drop from its present anemic price. Recall, he needs money.

Here’s his estimated DJT position:

Total Shares = 194,000,000; Trump owns 60%. = 116,400,000 shares; = 7,708,008,000 billion at its 2024 high $66.72/share, BUT that’s shrunk by more than 70% to 1,978,800,000 billion at today’s share price of $17/share. An on paper loss of some 5,730,000,000 billion. Trump is not pleased, we might suppose.

The Crucial “Lockup Period”

The trading debut of DJT initiated what’s known as a lock-up period, a standard procedure for newly public companies in which certain shareholders, like those who own 5% or more of shares or who serve in a high-level management role, mandating that they cannot sell shares until a predetermined date. At DJT these insiders include Trump himself; DJT board members (i.e., Donald Trump, Jr., David Nunes, and other Trump confidants);  co-founders, Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss*, both former contestants on The Apprentice; and others.

The company’s latest prospectus filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission outlines three factors that would trigger the lock-up period to conclude:

  • The end of the first six months of DJT stock trading as its own entity on September 29, or
  • Trump Media shares trading above $12 for any 20 of 30 trading sessions on September 19, or
  • a transaction, like a merger, in which all shareholders have the opportunity to trade in their Trump Media holdings at the same price, or
  • an affirmative vote by DJT’s Board of Directors

That means the earliest possible date Trump can sell is Sept. 19 if Trump Media shares remain above the $12 threshold, otherwise his selling date will open is on Sept. 25. Note, however, that “”Insiders might still be prevented from selling their shares after the lock-up period expires. That can happen when an insider has access to material, nonpublic information, where the sale of shares would legally constitute insider trading.”

I expect that he will sell whenever he can do so legally, although should he sell large blocks of DJT over few days the stock price would likely fall precipitously. He might still make hundreds of millions at lower shre prices, as would other insiders, yet Trump would take a public relations hit, especially if his MAGA supporters took a beating on their own desperate sell orders. A better strategy would be to sell more slowly, or not sell at all and, instead, seek a loan or loans against his holdings, yet, who is eager to loan him money on any collateral. Poor Trump, he needs an intelligent strategy and tactics. And he’s remarkably stupid. We’ll see what happens after September 19th.

Food for Thought – Continuing Angst Over Food Prices . . . as Food Inflation Falls

“Hardworking Americans are suffering because of the Harris-Biden administration’s dangerously liberal policies . . . Prices are excruciatingly high, and the cost of living has soared – leaving those on a fixed income unsure of how they are going to afford a basic standard of living in the future.”
Trump campaign statement prior to tonight’s MAGA rally in Asheville, NC

Continuing his trailblazing record of lying per minute (L/M), Donald Trump will tonight convince his MAGA acolytes that inflation is running at high speed. This in the face of Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report today that inflation is moderating as it has done for the past year. BLS sums it up:

“In July, the Consumer Price Index [CPI] rose 0.2 percent, seasonally adjusted, and rose 2.9 percent over the last 12 months, not seasonally adjusted.” 

Given the inflation panic afoot in the country, particularly among the always misinformed and generally undereducated MAGA crowd, the truth is clear: after peaking in 2022 and 2023 CPI has dropped over the past year to approximately 2.9%. Frankly, the inflation scare during the Biden administration was the result of unrelenting lying by the MAGA/GOP, and, of course, COVID’s negative economic impact, an extraneous and extraordinary event that has by and large worked its way through the economy as, for example, supply gluts diminish.

The COVID inflation 2-year “blip”


And below is CPI by sector, through July 2024 (note the overall trajectory and, apropos of this posting, the food sector, which, according to USDA’s Economic Research Service, peaked at 11.4% two years ago (year-over-year)(YOY), now sits at 2.2% YOY.

In fact, the overall CPI is nearing the Federal Reserve Board’s so-called “target rate” of 2%, and stock market mavens are so very pleased because inflation’s decreasing trend of late signals to them that the Fed next move may be to reduce interest rates, which – WHOOPEE! – will help reverse the equity markets’ recent swoon. Nonetheless, inflation hysteria haunts many American families, often at mealtime.

How did the now dissipated surge in overall food prices occur over the last few years (falling from August 2022’s 11.4% to today’s 2.1%)? The reasons, as with all food sector inflations, are familiar, although the COVID pandemic was an unusual event, and the principal driver of inflation throughout the economy. Food inflation factors, 2020-2024, include:

  • Supply chain issues due to COVID disruptions throughout the world
  • Economy-wide inflationary pressures, particularly in housing and services, and for a time, food 
  • Wholesale food prices, as suppliers raised prices, controversially, many label this price gouging 
  • Weather conditions, droughts reduce crop yields by causing crops to fail, and forced cow-calf producers to sell cows, which cause to tighter beef supplies and higher price; and extreme summer heat that damages crops, such as olive trees, soybeans, rice, potatoes and cocoa.
  • Supply disruptions in major food producing countries, particularly in war torn Ukraine, a European breadbasket
  • Rapid recovery of consumer demand, particularly in restaurant food
  • Animal disease outbreaks, avian flu substantially affected egg prices (and still does)

Eat, Drink, Be Merry, Inflation Be Damned

As we see, despite perceived food inflation causing gnashing of Americans’ teeth, their food costs have gone downhill, and the decline has occurred for long enough to have been noticeable to consumers. This is especially true for food at home, nonetheless, inflation remains troublesome at the businesses where food price inflation is the highest, restaurants of all kinds.

Let’s unpack this: where Americans eat is an personal and economic choice, and their choices are, according to especially right-wing economists, supposedly determined by price. Therefore, the “rational” economic choice would be to eat where one can eat most inexpensively, i.e., at home. And food at home prices have moderated since January 2023, with today’s BLS report revealing that food CPI is at 2.2% (YOY), with food at home inflation falling to 1.1% for July (YOY). Food away from home – a segment of the inflation-hot service economy – sits at 4.1%(YOY). The economically rational choice would be to eat at home, would it not? Indeed.

According to the USDA’s Economic Research Service July 2024 forecast, Food Price Outlook, 2024 and 2025:

“The level of food price inflation varies depending on whether the food was purchased for consumption at home or away from home.

  • The food-at-home (grocery store or supermarket food purchases) CPI was unchanged from May 2024 to June 2024 and was 1.1 percent higher than June 2023; and
  • The food-away-from-home (restaurant purchases) CPI increased 0.4 percent in June 2024 and was 4.1 percent higher than June 2023.”
Note the significantly higher rate of inflation growth for food away from home.

The CPI discrepancy between the choice of home prepared meals and restaurant meals is large, and this was not always true. As the chart indicates, beginning in 2011, restaurants, including fast food entities, claimed a large and growing share of consumer spending, except for the period when COVID adversely affected restaurants and families ate at home. A USDA report also observed, “Food-away-from-home expenditures accounted for 58.5 percent of total food expenditures in 2023—their highest share of total food spending observed in the series.”

So, the right-wing economists argument that consumers will make rational choices when prices are high seems to come up short when applied to food choices. We have inclinations to rational thought, nonetheless, we have impulses as well, and we simply enjoy going out to eat, especially when we perceive economic hard times. This despite the fact that we are manifestly not in a swooning economy. Perceptions, though are important. Thus we do the non rational things as a way to soothe those perceptions, and, ironically, we feed the very price inflation we perceive. It doesn’t help that media and the MAGA crowd push false messages, particularly Trump and company. As for me, I’ve convinced myself that what I need is an inflatedly large rib eye steak, at an inflatedly expensive restaurant. Tonight.

Here’s the “Great Inflation” We’ve All Been Hearing About

Since 2022, and the price of food is also retreating from its highs, while energy prices have dropped 25+% since 2022’s rise. Nevertheless, all we will continue to hear from the GOP/MAGA candidates is that inflation is soaring. . .