GOP Congressional Leadership Letter to Ben Bernanke, as Subtle as a Baby Ruth in a Federal Reserve Punch Bowl

September 21, 2011

Why did the GOP congressional leadership send a snail-mail missive to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke? Haven’t they gotten the news about “e-mail”? Do they need pen pals that badly? Do they need a loan? Or what?

Imagine, these legendary GOP lunkheads suddenly looking for “ample data,” “quantifiable benefits,” “measurable outcomes,” and . . . evidence!  Characteristically, in their letter below, they offer none of those to back up their assertions about the effects of Fed policies. They offer nothing but naked – and uncharacteristically weaselly – claims that “the Federal Reserve’s actions have likely led to more fluctuations and uncertainty in our already weak economy,” and “further intervention by the Federal Reserve could exacerbate current problems or further harm the U.S. economy.” 

It’s not surprising this Gang of No would “instruct” the Fed this way. They speak for the bigger gang of GOP/TP Fed haters. In good times and in bad times they detest the Federal Reserve. Now, however, having consciously slowed the economy by blocking any meaningful – and temporary – fiscal stimulus, they must kneecap the Fed. And now. Why? To cut off monetary stimulus as well. They cannot win the White House in 2012 without a substantially weakening economy between now and November 2012. Moreover, the blatant, if hamfistedly muted, threat against Bernanke and the Fed inherent in their letter is as subtle as a Hustler billboard in Vatican Square.

One wonders, are they playing chicken with a depression? Are they actively courting one for political purposes alone? It seems unlikely to seek economic catastrophe, but, recall, they are batsh*t crazy. We ought never underestimate batsh*t, or crazy. Here’s their cris de coeur, dated September 19, 2011:

“Dear Chairman Bernanke,

It is our understanding that the Board Members of the Federal Reserve will meet later this week to consider additional monetary stimulus proposals. We write to express our reservations about any such measures. Respectfully, we submit that the board should resist further extraordinary intervention in the U.S. economy, particularly without a clear articulation of the goals of such a policy, direction for success, ample data proving a case for economic action and quantifiable benefits to the American people.

It is not clear that the recent round of quantitative easing undertaken by the Federal Reserve has facilitated economic growth or reduced the unemployment rate. To the contrary, there has been significant concern expressed by Federal Reserve Board Members, academics, business leaders, Members of Congress and the public. Although the goal of quantitative easing was, in part, to stabilize the price level against deflationary fears, the Federal Reserve’s actions have likely led to more fluctuations and uncertainty in our already weak economy.

We have serious concerns that further intervention by the Federal Reserve could exacerbate current problems or further harm the U.S. economy. Such steps may erode the already weakened U.S. dollar or promote more borrowing by overleveraged consumers. To date, we have seen no evidence that further monetary stimulus will create jobs or provide a sustainable path towards economic recovery.

Ultimately, the American economy is driven by the confidence of consumers and investors and the innovations of its workers. The American people have reason to be skeptical of the Federal Reserve vastly increasing its role in the economy if measurable outcomes cannot be demonstrated. We respectfully request that a copy of this letter be shared with each Member of the Board.

Sincerely, Sen. Mitch McConnell, Rep. John Boehner, Sen. Jon Kyl, Rep. Eric Cantor”

Boehner Accidentally Tells the Truth About Tax Cuts

September 16, 2011

Mr. Boehner: “And here in Washington, there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of the economy and it’s led to an awful lot of bad decisions. And the reality is that employers will hire if they’ve got the right incentives, but the incentives have to outweigh the costs. As an example, businesses aren’t going to hire someone because the government’s going to give them a $4,000 tax credit, if the government mandates that are imposed on them cost a lot more than that temporary credit. In our recent years, these mandates have been overwhelming.”

“Government’s threat to job creation has two other components. One is the current tax code which discourages investments and rewards special interest. It strikes me as odd that at a time when it’s clear the tax code needs to be fundamentally reformed, the first instant to come out of Washington is to come up with a new host of tax credits that make the tax code more complex.”

In fact, what he criticizes is actually the ultimate Republican tax-cutting plan: It rewards the private sector for acting in its own best interest. And it gives wary companies that are now just hoarding their profits in cash the confidence that can get them to start expanding again.

And, it’s also the ultimate Democratic jobs-generating plan: It guarantees results before federal tax dollars are spent.

Moreover, it’s the ultimate tea party no-new-taxes/no-new-programs populist plan: It produces the new jobs without government adding more taxation or more reams of red tape.

And it is, by definition, the most shovel-ready plan any economist can conjure: By using job-generating tax credits to prime our economic pumps, not a dollar of taxpayer money would be spent before the private sector has created and filled the jobs.

A side benefit of this is that it is not one of those programs that reward the special interests that have invested in our politicians — presidents, senators and representatives — by giving them campaign money as a down payment for future access and consideration. All employers have a chance at getting this tax credit — all they need to do is hire new employees.

Now it turns out the template for this approach was just created. On Aug. 5, President Barack Obama announced a program to give companies tax credits for hiring unemployed military veterans. Employers hiring unemployed veterans would get a $2,400 maximum credit for every short-term hire and $4,800 for every long-term hire. The plan would give companies a $9,600 maximum credit for every long-term hire of a veteran with service-connected disabilities.

Well, if this works for creating jobs for unemployed military veterans, why not expand it to include all unemployed Americans? That Republican-sounding idea was raised by the former chair of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, Christina Romer: “There are 15 million other unemployed people,” Romer said. “Let’s do a big tax cut for any firm that’s willing to hire. Someone, I think, ought to be making the case for swinging for the fences, not small programs.”

GOP mantra, though, “no taxation without representation; no taxation with representation.”

Really, They Will Say ANYTHING! – House Majority Leader Eric Cantor on $45 Billion for School & Home Rehabilitation

September 14, 2011

From the newsstand copy of POLITICO that I found in a Starb*cks this a.m., a report about Eric CAN’Tor’s thinking on a portion of the American Jobs Acti.e. spending $45 billion dollars on rehabilitating schools and homes: “I don’t believe that our members are going to be interested in pursuing that,” House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) told reporters Monday. “I certainly am not. There are perhaps laudable goals behind the proposals, [but] the fact is we don’t have the money. And we’ve got to prioritize. And right now, it’s about getting people back to work.”

I wondered, is Mr. CAN’Tor acquainted with how buildings are “rehabilitated”? Without exception, these projects require construction workers and the use of durable goods, two areas where the unemployment rate runs from 9.1% (durables) to 13.5% (construction). That’s a bit more than 2 million people, many out of work for more than two years, and many more doing part-time work only, among the huge numbers of underemployed. In addition, rehab projects require electricians, plumbers, architects, security personnel, inspectors, permitting, and other allied professions. These jobs then cause other services to gear up. Think insurance, food services, etc. The dollar put into the economy “grows” – $45 billion for these projects might then result in $145 billion in carry on spending from the private sector that, now, is sitting on huge piles of cash, literally, cash in money market funds.

The real answer, though, is of course the obvious one: CAN’Tor and his minions are out to remove Keynes from the economics texts, to dismantle governments – don’t kid yourself – of all sizes. Supporting useful fiscal stimulus (they actually do know it’s useful) is, to them, off limits. And all this despite the mischief it spawns in the country. In poker terms, they are all in. They believe, despite all the evidence, that the private sector will leap to the rescue, and rehab those schools and homes! If only they could pay well below the minimum wage; if only they were utterly unregulated; if only they didn’t have to do this; if only they didn’t have to do that; if only; if only. . .