Words of “This is NOT the way to win a presidential election”

From the Biden campaign, few seconds ago, I received this email offering a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” for something I do not want:

President Biden.
President Obama.
George Clooney.
Julia Roberts.
And YOU! We’re running a contest to give supporters like you a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to win an all-expenses-paid trip to meet two presidents and two movie stars. All you have to do is pitch in today, and you (and a guest of your choosing) could be having your very own in-person conversation with President Biden and some of his good friends. You don’t want to miss this opportunity, Michael: Chip in $25 today and your name will be automatically entered for a chance to meet President Biden, President Obama, George Clooney, and Julia Roberts! No amount is too small, and your contribution will support our campaign and Democrats nationwide, so don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity — enter now! Thank you for being part of our team, Michael, Biden HQ

For background, let’s look back a week at a recent celebrity-heavy marketing idea: Robert De Niro’s comments outside the Trump courthouse NY election fraud trial. He’s certainly media-ready and entitled (in both meanings of the word) to have his say. Here’s part of his say:

“We New Yorkers used to tolerate him when he was just another crappy real estate hustler masquerading as a big shot . . . I love this city. I don’t want to destroy it. Donald Trump wants to destroy not only the city but the country, and, eventually, he could destroy the world. . . . I don’t mean to scare you. No, wait, maybe I do mean to scare you. . . If Trump returns to the White House, you can kiss these freedoms goodbye that we all take for granted.”

Certainly, having long-term ties with the south shore of New York’s Long Island, I agree with De Niro’s take. Being old enough, at 74, I fully recall how we who knew “the Donald” berated him as New York’s most sinister yet ridiculous cartoon character, akin to De Niro’s own 1982 movie character Rupert Pupkin in The King of Comedy. And I understand De Niro’s passion, it was good to see an actual liberal at the microphone rather than the perpetual parade of MAGA politicos in Trump red necktie costumes blurting outrageous lies.

In any event, back to the email I just received . . . Who does the Biden campaign’s outreach appeal to? Firstly, who would believe that “you (and a guest of your choosing) could be having your very own in-person conversation with President Biden and some of his good friends,” Barack Obama, George Clooney, and Julia Roberts? Was Barbra Streisand busy? And what would I, for example, offer in conversation that would interest Barack, Julia, and George? That’s a rhetorical question.

Secondly, appeals to celebrity charisma has been a mainstay tendency that has addled our society for far too long, and, for seriousness sake, Democrats are the worst offenders, facetiously and self-servingly pounding that drum. The Biden campaign’s celebrity-based offer of far-left liberal geegaw is grist for the mill of antri-Democrat insult among MAGAs, of course, but also independents (whose votes we desperately need). Instead, have campaign messages take a rhetorical and tactical stance commensurate with the criticality of this election. Please!

Long may you run . . . .

Finally, this Biden celebrity campaign appeal is insulting to the seriousness of the moment, and the voter, it’s frankly grifty in its character: subconsciously insinuating that this election is just another contest, not the kind of election that De Niro’s cris de coeur identified: an election wherein a Trump win could engage us perhaps in a bloody battle to preserve the very country “that we all take for granted.” I’ve voted since 1968, and I believed every presidential election was the most important of our history, in hindsight, perhaps in history’s arc, unknown to us, they were. There’s an old saying I’ll paraphrase: “When, with age, we lose our physical strength, let us hope we grow in wisdom.” Bar none, this election is the most consequential in our history, and, coincidentally enough, the next president’s term will begin in 2025, our nation’s 250th anniversary.

Wisconsin GoverNO! Scott Walker Biting the Hand That Fed Him?

February 28, 2011

Watching Wisconsin public sector employees asserting their right to collective bargaining, I wondered whether GoverNO! Scott Walker was about to bite the hand that fed him – to fire, as he has threatened lately, more than a thousand state employees should he fail to get his way on ending meaningful collective bargaining for public sector employees. Interestingly, these are some of his own campaign contributors. So, last evening I visited Wisconsin’s Campaign Finance Information System (WCFIS) to see how many public-school teachers contributed to Friends of Scott Walker, his campaign organization. I ran a search of the contributions database and queried monetary donations only.

Although the number of public-school teachers who contributed money to Scott Walker’s gubernatorial campaign was small, their contributions were generous. In all, these 37 public servants donated $10, 304.99 to help catapult Mr. Walker into the governor’s mansion. The average contribution is somewhat less useful than the median since four contributors gave more than $1,000, skewing the average to the high side. The median of $250, though, indicates that half the teachers gave less than that and half gave more. These generous people included full-time teachers, of course. But there were also teachers’ aides; a substitute teacher; a music teacher; a teacher/librarian; retired public school teachers; and a special ed. teacher. 

The fact, though, that teachers gave contributions to Walker’s campaign is not a foolproof indication of their underlying reasons for doing so. The data provided by WCFIS doesn’t, of course, indicate whether they are union members at all. In fact, their motivations may be far from education issues altogether; some, maybe all, admired Walker for his stance on abortion (he’s against, regardless of the reason), or his fiscal conservatism. His beliefs about the importance of asserting state sovereignty move some, as well as his anti-tax stance. And, let’s face it, Scott Walker’s feelings about public sector unions have been well-known for many years, particularly in Milwaukee.  So, anyone who didn’t, at the very least, suspect that a Walker governorship would not go easy on collective bargaining was not paying attention.

So, perhaps the list below does not reveal anything certain about the contributors at all. Yet, one can’t help wonder if a few of those teachers who gave their support to candidate Walker tonight sit near the state capitol, having marched and chanted all day, and entertaining some doubts and regrets . . .

Contributors to Scott Walker’s Gubernatorial Campaign Identifying Themselves As Teachers (monetary donations only).

[The numbers in brackets indicate the total number of contributions made.]

ContributionOccupationEmployer
220TEACHER — ED05 – EDUCATION – TEACHER HIGH SCHOOLKenosha High School
1000TEACHERElmbrook School District
350 [2]TEACHERMilwaukee Public Schools (MPS)
475 [3]TEACHERS AIDE — ED03 – EDUCATION – INSTRUCTORMontello High School
400 [3]Education – Teacher K through 12Racine Unified Schools
125 [3]TEACHER — ED06 – EDUCATION – TEACHER K THROUGH 12Wauwatosa School District
250TEACHERElkorn Area School District
250TEACHERSlinger School Dist.
200TEACHERMPS
49.99TEACHER — ED05 – EDUCATION – TEACHER HIGH SCHOOLHortonville School District
65 [3]TEACHERIowa-Grant Schools
100TEACHER/LIBRARIANKiel Area School District
350 [2]TEACHERElkhorn Area Middle School
200MUSIC TEACHERBrookfield Christian School
125 [2]RETIRED — ED06 – EDUCATION – TEACHER K THROUGH 12retired – public school
325 [4]TEACHER — ED06 – EDUCATION – TEACHER K THROUGH 12Franklin Public Schools
125 [7]RETIRED (FORMER TEACHER) — OT02 – OTHER – RETIREDRetired – public school
150Teacher’s AideKewaskum School District
1250 [4]SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERWalworth County
50TEACHERFranklin Public Schools
100RETIRED – TEACHERRetired – public school
100TEACHEROshkosh Area School District
300TEACHERMilwaukee Area Technical College
150 [2]TEACHERWest Allis/West Milwaukee Schools
1500 [2]Education – Teacher K through 12Whitnall Schools
25TEACHERPittsville Elem.
120 [4]RETIRED TEACHERManitowoc Public School District
100TEACHERRetired – public school
250TeacherMequon-Thiensville School District
325 [6]TEACHER — ED06 – EDUCATION – TEACHER K THROUGH 12MPS
50TEACHERMilwaukee Public Schools
70 [2]TEACHERSchool District of Cudahy
245 [8]TEACHER — ED06 – EDUCATION – TEACHER K THROUGH 12Milwaukee Public Schools
500TEACHER (RETIRED)Mequon-Thiensville School District
50SUBSTITUTE TEACHER — ED03 – EDUCATION – INSTRUCTORWatertown School District
200Education – Teacher K through 12Greendale School District
160 [4]SUBSTITUTE TEACHERself [public school]

Source: Wisconsin’s Campaign Finance Information System