Trump Ups His Sick War on Abortion by Putting Women’s Minds at Rest…

At a campaign rally yesterday in Pennsylvania, Trump tried to pander to women voters, disastrously, that he’s not a threat but will be their “protector” in abortion matters, and in general:

  • “I always thought women liked me. But the fake news keeps saying women don’t like me. [But] You will be protected, and I will be your protector. Women will be happy, healthy, confident and free. You will no longer be thinking about abortion.”

The president who ushered in the overturning of Roe v. Wade, bragged about sexually assaulting women, and was found liable for sexual abuse now realizes that the legacy of the Dobbs decision that his three Supreme Court nominees made possible isn’t polling well. So he’s on the reassurance grift. There is a mind-set demonstrated by his “soothing” words that shows a glaringly stupid lack of understanding of even the grade school basics of what women desire in all aspects of their lives, especially abortion.

For example, his “You will be protected, and I will be your protector”: women no longer accept (if they ever did) that their relationships with men be a “protector/protectee” paternalistic bargain, freighted with exceedingly onerous obligations. For example, Trump (of all men) telling them “Women will be happy, healthy, confident and free” indicates his belief that men (specifically himself) alone by their paternalistic largesse can make women happy, healthy, confident and free. This, from Trump, a serial sex assaulter, adulterer, adjudicated rapist, defamer, and “pussy grabber.” He and the MAGA crowd simply have no overall, historical, cultural, or conceptual understanding of feminist goals. And trying to fake it just digs them in deeper and rightly alienates millions of women, and men.

And there’s this:

More Reassurance from Ohio…

GOP Senate nominee Bernie Moreno (OH), at a town hall event last week but first reported yesterday by NBC4 in Columbus. As you’ll see, Moreno vocalizes the MAGA self-centered view that one’s vote ought to matter only when an issue DIRECTLY threatens one’s own life, not, for example, the lives of all women, including their daughters and granddaughters.

“You know, the left has a lot of single issue voters. Sadly, by the way, there’s a lot of suburban women, a lot of suburban women that are like, ‘Listen, abortion is it. If I can’t have an abortion in this country whenever I want, I will vote for anybody else.’ … OK. It’s a little crazy by the way, but — especially for women that are like past 50 — I’m thinking to myself, ‘I don’t think that’s an issue for you.'”

As for Trump’s conclusion, “[Women] will no longer be thinking about abortion,” the absurdity of that in every way spotlights his utter lack of understanding of women’s daily lives. Women walk through life with targets on their chests and backs, at all ages, placed there by men like Trump and Moreno.

Insulin Cost Cap – Trump Attacks a Biden Signature Achievement With a Trump Signature Deception

A week ago, Trump took to his Truth Social safe space to make a specious claim about a problem vexing millions of diabetic Americans on Medicare, the out-of-pocket/copay cost of insulin, one of the more contentious political issues of the day, especially since Medicare beneficiaries comprise a population with higher prevalence of diabetes (33%, 22 million) than the general population (11%, 37 million). More than three million people with Medicare coverage use insulin.

So, let us ask of the man who spent much of his administration trying to repeal the Affordable Health Care Act, “What would a serious and informed policy disagreement about Medicare and insulin coverage be without Donald Trump?” Asked and answered last Saturday:

“Low INSULIN PRICING was gotten for millions of Americans by me, and the Trump Administration, not by Crooked Joe Biden. He had NOTHING to do with it. It was all done long before he so sadly entered office. All he does is try to take credit for things done by others, in this case, ME!” Truth Social, June 8, 2024

This is firstly, stupid, and secondly, nonresponsive, simultaneously both false and true, a hallmark of Trump & Company. It’s a technique that confuses those who do not follow the ins-and-outs of government policy, and many who do follow it. Trump’s Truth Social post conflates outright lying with some actual facts that, on analysis, are, indeed, truthful, but that don’t advance Trump’s argument. Given that, his argument is iconically specious, i.e., apparently good or right though lacking real merit; superficially pleasing or plausible. So, let’s dig in and deconstruct.

Trump Administration’s Half-Baked Accomplishment

“I don’t use insulin, Should I be? Huh? I never thought about it.
But I know a lot of people are very badly affected, right? Unbelievable.”
Donald Trump, a nondiabetic, displaying
his advanced knowledge of the subject
USA Today, May 26, 2020

The above crackpot quote was served up by then President Trump at a May 26, 2020 formal White House Rose Garden speech about, among other things, an executive action reducing the copay cost of insulin to $35 for Medicare recipients. Here’s the summary excerpt from the White House (ironically named) Fact Sheet released during that Rose Garden speech:

LOWERING COST OF INSULIN FOR SENIORS: President Donald J. Trump and his Administration are lowering out-of-pocket insulin costs for Medicare’s seniors.

“Under President Trump’s leadership, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is announcing that many Medicare Part D plans and Medicare Advantage plans have applied to offer lower out-of-pocket insulin costs to seniors for the 2021 plan year.

Across the Nation, participating enhanced Part D plans will provide many seniors with Medicare access to a broad set of insulins at a maximum $35 copay for a month’s supply of each type of insulin.

And,

Lowering out-of-pocket insulin costs will provide the many Medicare beneficiaries who rely on one or more common forms of insulin with plan options that will deliver critical relief.

And,

No effort will be spared to give America’s seniors the care and support and devotion and love they have earned and that they deserve. President Donald J. Trump, March 26, 2020

In fact, rather than sparing no efforts, Trump administration’s policy spared many efforts. Unrevealed was that the cost cap would apply to only a small subset of 3.5 million insulin-dependent Medicare beneficiaries, and they were still stuck with a yearly deductible. That’s a big “unreveal” that affected many. Nonetheless, the Fact Sheet excerpt reads as if all insulin-dependent Medicare beneficiaries would receive the new copay cost cap. So, factually, Trump’s policy did lower insulin costs, but despite being presented as a cure-all for Medicare patients, it was misleadingly presented, ergo, factual but largely false since so many on Medicare were left out.

For Trump, even this half-baked policy was something he didn’t want to establish, nor did the pharmaceutical CEOs, or insulin suppliers who colluded with him design it as anything more than a sop to the Medicare voting bloc. Trump had been suffering some blowback on the issue and needed something that he knew he could sell as a major accomplishment to his diabetic MAGA Medicare recipients (many of whom were excluded from the insulin cap). Nonetheless, at a 2020 presidential debate Trump boasted that lowered insulin prices that vials were “so cheap, it’s like water”, despite insulin prices remaining fixed at about $300 per vial. And that wasn’t misleading, that was 100% false.

The Biden Administration’s Meaningful Accomplishment

Jump forward from the Trump administration’s weak insulin copay cost policy to today. President Biden achieved much when he signed the August 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Among those achievements was a new insulin copay cap program (effective date January 1, 2023 for Medicare Part D, and July 1, 2023 for Medicare Part B). Also, as of January 1, 2024, eligibility for the Part D Low Income Subsidy (LIS) expanded from 135 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) to 150 percent of FPL, which allows these enrollees to further reduce their out-of-pocket costs for insulin. Also, under the Inflation Reduction Act, beginning in plan year 2023 (Jan-Dec), Medicare Part D enrollees no longer may have a deductible for insulin and must have a maximum $35 monthly co-payment. These are broad and meaningful benefits, rather than – as Trump’s 2020 executive action was – a simply cynical political expedient to attempt to silence critics by, basically, confusing them. (Note, however, as always, Senate Republicans tried to block the $35 cap on price of insulin from the Inflation Reduction Act.)

As the copay cap program became effective in January 2023, an October HHS report, Insulin Affordability and the Inflation Reduction Act: Medicare Beneficiary Savings by State and Demographics, disclosed:

KEY POINTS
• The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) caps insulin out-of-pocket spending at $35 per month’s supply of each insulin product covered under a Medicare Part D plan, with similar limits for out-of-pocket costs for insulin supplied under Part B, and reduces out-of-pocket drug spending in Medicare in other ways.
. . . [Omitted — States that the study used data below based upon analysis of 2019 data]
• Nationally, [during 2019, Trump administration] the average out-of-pocket cost was $58 per insulin fill, typically for a 30-day supply. The average cost per fill among people who were uninsured for the entire year was $123, more than double the national average. Patients with private insurance or Medicare paid about $63 per fill on average.
• [During 2019] About 37 percent of insulin fills for Medicare enrollees (Part B and Part D) required cost-sharing exceeding $35 per fill, including 24 percent that exceeded $70 per fill. About 36 percent of insulin fills for people without insurance and 35 percent for people with private insurance had cost sharing above $35 per fill. These estimates are only for enrollees who filled an insulin prescription and do not include potential costs for patients who did not fill their insulin due to cost or other reasons.
• We estimate that 1.5 million Medicare beneficiaries would have benefited from the new [Inflation Reduction Act] insulin cost-sharing limits if they had been in effect [during] 2020, [rather than Trump’s policy] with savings to those beneficiaries of about $734 million in Part D and $27 million in Part B – or approximately $500 in average annual savings per person among those benefiting from the provision. [Emphasis added]

The Trump plan lacked coverage for millions of Medicare insulin users. The Inflation Reduction Act remedied that.

Jump Forward to . . . Last Saturday & Donald Trump

Yes, this again:

“Low INSULIN PRICING was gotten for millions of Americans by me, and the Trump Administration, not by Crooked Joe Biden. He had NOTHING to do with it. It was all done long before he so sadly entered office. All he does is try to take credit for things done by others, in this case, ME!” Truth Social post, June 8, 2024

Why now, why this spirited defense? The closeness of the 2024 election, in time and in winning margin, sespite Trump’s overwhelming confidence, he may have been alerted to the fact that today’s seniors, particularly baby boomers over 64, are not majority GOP voters seniors as we’ve assumed. And Trump relies on them, and trusts them to support him, and boomers now represent 60+% of the senior vote. More conservative or radical voters have died since the 2016 and 2020 elections at a greater number than baby boomers have joined the senior voting bloc. An April 26 NYT article succinctly summed it up:

“Mr. Biden’s strength among seniors might be surprising, but the likeliest explanation is deceptively simple: At every stage earlier in their lives, many of today’s seniors voted Democratic. They just got older.”

As a 74 year-old baby boomer I unanimously agree. (I’m also a diabetic who once used insulin and now use Ozempic exclusively: O! O! O! Ozempic!) Given the millions of Medicare insulin-dependent patients, insulin costs – Trump may have learned is a salient issue in the presidential race and as the chart below suggests, the blue seniors still retain their leftie reputation:

And since the 2012 election, much has changed. Baby boomers could decide the 2024 election, although Gen Z voters appear to be trending more conservative/MAGA, older voters vote in greater percentage terms than younger ones. Therefore, if not Trump himself, then it’s likely someone in the Trump campaign alerted him that the Medicare voting bloc was at risk, not only on general issues, but on pocketbook issues like the Medicare insulin cap. It’s unlikely, however, that many approved of his outlandish June 8th tweet and the blowback that established how cynical and untrue it was. We baby boomers aren’t babies anymore and we are still predominantly hippies . . .

What Would a Strong Biden Border Security Executive Order Be Without Donald Trump

In a video posted on Truth Social last Tuesday, Trump laid out another spoil sport diatribe even more maniacal than usual. This in the wake of President Biden’s recent Presidential Proclamation that closes the southern border depending on the number of border encounters. This will dramatically reduce the pressure on the border. The policy will allow Biden to close the border between points of entry once there is an average of 2,500 crossings over the past week preceding a given day. Trump preposterously claims that this will “make the invasion worse.” Of course, that’s logically categorical bullsh*t. What Biden’s action may make worse – hopefully – is Trump’s ability to own the immigration issue.

That Biden makes me so mad!!!

Crooked Joe Biden, the worst president in the history of our country by far, has totally surrendered our southern border. His weakness and extremism have resulted in a border invasion like we have never seen before,” began Trump. “Other countries have emptied out their prisons, insane asylums and mental institutions and sent us drug dealers, human traffickers, and terrorists. Millions of people have poured into our country and now, after nearly four years of his failed, weak leadership, pathetic leadership, Crooked Joe Biden is pretending to finally do something about the border.

But in fact, it’s all about Joe because he knows we have a debate coming up in three weeks. The truth is that Joe Biden’s executive order won’t stop the invasion. It’s weak and it’s pathetic; it will actually make the invasion worse. Millions of people a year will continue to pour across our border and be released into our country. And we recently learned Biden is secretly granting mass amnesty to hundreds of thousands of these illegal aliens, along with welfare and government benefits, work permits and jobs. He’s not doing that, however, for our veterans. He’s not doing that for our homeless. He’s giving illegal aliens far more than our veterans get, far more than our homeless get.

Many of the left are even pushing for illegal aliens to vote in our elections, which is what this is all about. That’s why they’re allowing up to 20 million people since he took office. When I was president, we built over 500 miles of border wall, stopped the flood of criminals, and we had the safest border in the history of our country. We need to secure our border once again. We need to secure our border once and for all. Crooked Joe will never get the job done. He doesn’t want to get the job done. It’s just words and misinformation because he could have done it very easily. All he had to do is say, “Close the border.” That’s the power of the presidency.

But when I’m elected, it will be my top priority. On day one, I will seal the border, stop the invasion, and send Joe Biden’s illegal aliens back home. They have to be sent back home because no country can sustain the damage that our country is sustaining. All over the world, crime rates are going down because all over the world, not just South America, they are sending criminals into the United States of America. They’re taking their drug dealers and their people in jail, lots of people in jail. They’re taking their murderers, killers, they’re taking them all and sending them into the United States. In Venezuela crime is down a staggering 67%. Because if you go to Caracas, if you go to different places, they’re sending their criminals into the United States. It’s a horrible thing. And that’s happening all over the world, many, many places, many countries.

We’re not going to let it continue. We’re going to get them out. We’re going to bring our country back to safety. We’re going to make America great again, greater than ever before. Thank you very much.

This Presidential Poll May Toll Good News for Biden

Today’s Emerson College poll, among the few more than a week after Trump’s election interference convictions, signals some good news for the Biden campaign. The poll was conducted June 4-5 among 1,000 registered voters and has a margin of error of 3%. This June 5 poll has the advantage of respondents having had a week to consider the guilty verdicts, as opposed to those polls conducted immediately after the verdict. Below is the “headline” chart (with my notes superimposed):

As for the pregnant question, during the six-weeks of the NY election fraud trial and the convictions, Trump’s strength stayed at 46%, while Biden’s rose from 43% to 45%, a hopeful sign. This is particularly meaningful when you view Trump’s meteoric rise during the Trump indictment period, from 41% to $47% as MAGAites expressed their increased support for a criminally indicted presidential candidate. Biden, though, also rose, from 42.5% to 44% during that time. If one reads the headline chart as a trend, then Trump’s supporters have remained in a flat pattern, even after the May 30 convictions when they usually react positively to Trump’s criminality. Biden’s ratings, however, rose from 43% to 45%. If indeed this is a trend then that’s the hope in hopeful because I, for one, expected this poll to indicate a burst of post-conviction enthusiasm among Trump supporters, particularly when compared to their euphoria during Trump’s indictment season. Some Trumpists have drifted – south.

Also hopeful, the trends among independent and undecided voters were meaningful. Emerson pollsters concluded:

A plurality of independents say it makes no impact (41%), while 38% are less likely to vote for Trump and 21% more likely. 58% of undecided voters say the conviction does not impact their vote; 36% less likely, 6% more likely. [Emphasis added]

The “less likely” versus the “more likely” to vote for Trump, in a likely close election, favor very much the “less likely” choice. That’s, after all, a significant voting bloc.

The next big test, the public reaction to Biden’s Proclamation on border security, now in effect, for an indeterminate time. Should this succeed in stemming the immigration tide, polling data will reflect that. The consequences may – should – move more independents and undecideds into the Biden column, but a weak Biden campaign communications office needs to step up. Bigtime.

Then, on the calendar for June 27th, comes the first debate, which ought to very much rock the presidential polling. If Biden, between now and then, continues his post-Trump conviction upward polling trend, the public may be in a psychologically friendly mood to conceivably lean toward Biden’s debate performance, especially for independents and undecideds. And should Trump act out manically and maniacally as a debater, his usual tactic, then those voters may swing even more towards Biden. Once again, from my typewriter to Goddess’s ears. . .

Trump’s Foreign Travel Plans Hit 37 Speed Bumps

Countries rejoicing in the news that Donald Trump will not be visiting anytime soon now that he’s a convicted felon include Australia, China, Brazil, Canada, Cuba, India, Iran, Israel, Mexico, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. There are exceptions, however, and Russia and Hungary, two of his favorite authoritarian vacation destinations, are among them. Also, in some countries, UK being one of them, after he (hopefully) serves his prison sentence and clears probation, he’ll be able to visit (except spoil-sport Canada where there a very few exceptions).

Come what may, Trump is on the face of it barred from personally sullying the countries of approximately 2.5 billion souls. Finally, he’s a billionaire!!

Full list of countries that restrict visits from felons

  1. Argentina
  2. Australia
  3. Brazil
  4. Cambodia
  5. Canada
  6. Chile
  7. China
  8. Cuba
  9. Dominican Republic
  10. Egypt
  11. Ethiopia
  12. Hong Kong
  13. India
  14. Indonesia
  15. Iran
  16. Ireland
  17. Israel
  18. Japan
  19. Kenya
  20. Malaysia
  21. Macau
  22. Mexico
  23. Morocco
  24. Nepal
  25. New Zealand
  26. Peru
  27. Philippines
  28. Singapore
  29. South Africa
  30. South Korea
  31. Taiwan
  32. Tanzania
  33. Tunisia
  34. Turkey
  35. Ukraine
  36. United Arab Emirates
  37. United Kingdom

Words of “This is NOT the way to win a presidential election”

From the Biden campaign, few seconds ago, I received this email offering a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity” for something I do not want:

President Biden.
President Obama.
George Clooney.
Julia Roberts.
And YOU! We’re running a contest to give supporters like you a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to win an all-expenses-paid trip to meet two presidents and two movie stars. All you have to do is pitch in today, and you (and a guest of your choosing) could be having your very own in-person conversation with President Biden and some of his good friends. You don’t want to miss this opportunity, Michael: Chip in $25 today and your name will be automatically entered for a chance to meet President Biden, President Obama, George Clooney, and Julia Roberts! No amount is too small, and your contribution will support our campaign and Democrats nationwide, so don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity — enter now! Thank you for being part of our team, Michael, Biden HQ

For background, let’s look back a week at a recent celebrity-heavy marketing idea: Robert De Niro’s comments outside the Trump courthouse NY election fraud trial. He’s certainly media-ready and entitled (in both meanings of the word) to have his say. Here’s part of his say:

“We New Yorkers used to tolerate him when he was just another crappy real estate hustler masquerading as a big shot . . . I love this city. I don’t want to destroy it. Donald Trump wants to destroy not only the city but the country, and, eventually, he could destroy the world. . . . I don’t mean to scare you. No, wait, maybe I do mean to scare you. . . If Trump returns to the White House, you can kiss these freedoms goodbye that we all take for granted.”

Certainly, having long-term ties with the south shore of New York’s Long Island, I agree with De Niro’s take. Being old enough, at 74, I fully recall how we who knew “the Donald” berated him as New York’s most sinister yet ridiculous cartoon character, akin to De Niro’s own 1982 movie character Rupert Pupkin in The King of Comedy. And I understand De Niro’s passion, it was good to see an actual liberal at the microphone rather than the perpetual parade of MAGA politicos in Trump red necktie costumes blurting outrageous lies.

In any event, back to the email I just received . . . Who does the Biden campaign’s outreach appeal to? Firstly, who would believe that “you (and a guest of your choosing) could be having your very own in-person conversation with President Biden and some of his good friends,” Barack Obama, George Clooney, and Julia Roberts? Was Barbra Streisand busy? And what would I, for example, offer in conversation that would interest Barack, Julia, and George? That’s a rhetorical question.

Secondly, appeals to celebrity charisma has been a mainstay tendency that has addled our society for far too long, and, for seriousness sake, Democrats are the worst offenders, facetiously and self-servingly pounding that drum. The Biden campaign’s celebrity-based offer of far-left liberal geegaw is grist for the mill of antri-Democrat insult among MAGAs, of course, but also independents (whose votes we desperately need). Instead, have campaign messages take a rhetorical and tactical stance commensurate with the criticality of this election. Please!

Long may you run . . . .

Finally, this Biden celebrity campaign appeal is insulting to the seriousness of the moment, and the voter, it’s frankly grifty in its character: subconsciously insinuating that this election is just another contest, not the kind of election that De Niro’s cris de coeur identified: an election wherein a Trump win could engage us perhaps in a bloody battle to preserve the very country “that we all take for granted.” I’ve voted since 1968, and I believed every presidential election was the most important of our history, in hindsight, perhaps in history’s arc, unknown to us, they were. There’s an old saying I’ll paraphrase: “When, with age, we lose our physical strength, let us hope we grow in wisdom.” Bar none, this election is the most consequential in our history, and, coincidentally enough, the next president’s term will begin in 2025, our nation’s 250th anniversary.

Reverend Al Sharpton’s Top-Notch Advice for Biden Campaign Tactics Vs. Trump

Just a few minutes ago, on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Reverend Al Sharpton bluntly and brilliantly invited Joe Biden to a street fight. Informing the assembled panel of politically correct conflict averse Morning Joe regulars – other than Scarborough himself – that Biden’s approach is far too soft in his race against Trump, the apex predator; the Rev, cried “Havoc!” and let the dogs out, saying:

Job opening: Street Fightin’ Man

“The thing I think the Biden campaign needs to do, Joe, is to realize they are not in a professional boxing match, they’re in a street fight. Donald Trump is a street fighter. You do not come into the ring with gloves, looking for the referee to stop it every three minutes and rest. No, this is a street fight, you come in with a broke bottle and an ash can because it’s gonna be that kind of battle, and he doesn’t understand anything else, and you have to show in a graphical way him saying ‘Use bleach,’ and then show the lines of people at food chains trying to line up to get free food like they had to do at my headquarters with Andre the Chef. You need to be graphic about it. You need to show people protesting about George Floyd and him standing in front of a church with a bible that he cleared them out with tear gas. You need to come and street fight because if you street fight him you can beat him.”

This is as well-stated as I’ve heard this election cycle, especially on a mainstream media outlet. The aversion to politically blunt language among the networks is a massive disservice to the country as it faces a potential political disaster should Trump be elected just five months from now, yes, just five months. We’re at DEFCON 2. We’ve no time for tree hugging, politically correct, anemic political narration. The Rev’s cry from the heart is, frankly, what Sharpton was born to do at many junctions in the past, and especially now.

Unfortunately, I hope otherwise, but this call to arms will most certainly be ignored, so mired in soft language has the center of the Democratic party become. I do give Biden credit for his (too) recent turn towards more aggressive rhetoric which began six months ago at the State of the Union address. Nevertheless, he is constitutionally not inclined in that direction and lacks the bluntness needed to injure Trump. Biden does not have the “voice” for ruthlessness. Moreover, his surrogates do not appear enough in public to keep up a steady drumbeat.

In effect, the campaign speaks in broad generalities about concepts like “democracy” and “rule of law” that are rarely backed up with stark examples of how Trump has, and will if elected, brutally assault them. They need to point to the GOP’s Heritage Foundation screed, Project 2025, the written plans for Trump’s attack on our government. See gruesome examples galore in their Project 2025 playbook. They are telling us in 900+ pages exactly what they plan for America, it’s a Mein Kampf of sorts.

Hopefully, there is time to remedy this, although it’s unlikely that anything other than a full-on declaration of political war with the Trump campaign will suffice. We’re in deep trouble with our backs to the wall. Let’s pray for the realization of this John Dryden quote:

“Beware the fury of the patient man.”


The Truly Crucial Election 2024: “Not the odds, but the stakes”

Elections Have Consequences, Let’s Report Them With That In Mind

Months ago, Joe Rosen, an NYU journalism professor and writer for PressThink, coined a valuable phrase, well-aimed at the media, about our upcoming 2024 election: “Not the odds, but the stakes.” A concise phrase, easily memorable, it’d make a great tee shirt. And it ought to be repeated, hopefully helping to create a national “organizing principle,” as he calls it. We most certainly need an organizing principle to replace the near universal betting sheet analysis of election 2024 by media outlets.

Personally, I enjoy and like MSNBC’s Steve Kornacke, yet he epitomizes the genre, and in his case, his on-air delivery at breakneck speed resembles nothing less than the running of the Kentucky Derby. This approach creates a sense of emotional excitement that short circuits viewers’ more considered thinking about the election. As a country we often view elections as sports events, in candor, there is more than a scintilla of horseracing about elections. But in a crucial election, when this characterization becomes primary, as it is in this upcoming election, it can have a numbing effect on the mind’s ability to view elections soberly: too much adrenalin as an election year lifestyle.

Now, Perhaps More Than Ever Before

Most importantly, this election is truly, explosively, undeniably crucial. Though it’s trite to say so, a trite observation isn’t always and forever wrong, particularly when Donald Trump is the likely GOP candidate. As I wrote in “Is This Election “Crucial”? You Bet It Is!”:

We don’t need to wonder if this election is crucial. No waiting for hindsight is required. Drop the debate about it. Use time, especially air time, more productively. We’ve already witnessed Trump and company at work; they openly showed their cards to the entire nation. He earned two impeachments, 90 some odd criminal charges for actions he feels entitled to, and near universal disdain here and abroad for using the nuclear option against our electoral college and his own Vice President. If this was the warm-up act, imagine the main event. Despite my admission that hindsight plays an important role in labeling presidential elections “crucial,” we don’t need hindsight to label this election crucial. We’ve been to the circus and we saw the elephants.

Hopefully, Professor Rosen’s memorable phrase will explode off the Twitter/X page and infiltrate editorial and producers’ weekly meetings of media actors everywhere. Let’s replace the odds with the stakes, and soon.