The Fates Of 9/11 – NYPD’s Moira Smith, Her Daughter Patricia, and Life Beyond Memory

September 11, 2011

Ten years ago today, Moira Smith, a 13th Precinct NYPD Officer on September 11th, died while saving others in the pyre that on that Tuesday was the World Trade Center. Brooklyn born, Irish Catholic bred, she was 38, an active and cheerful woman, who, five years before had run with the bulls in Spain with Jim Smith – her then boyfriend, and later her husband. She’d consciously tempted fate then and had before. In 1991, she’d confronted destiny head on while rescuing victims of a Union Square subway crash, and for her bravery Moira earned the NYPD’s Distinguished Duty Medal. She ran her races well, with strength and exceptional courage. On 9/11 Moira Smith ran in and out of the south Tower saving others. This time, though, she ran headlong and without hesitation into her heroic end. Moira A. Smith was the only woman of 23 NYPD officers to die that day. 

She left behind many who loved her, her husband Jim, and her beloved daughter, Patricia Mary, just two years old on 9/11. As Michael Daly writes below, mother and daughter today, ten years on, bespeak “the opposing tides of the receding past and the onrushing future.”  What a beautiful story he tells . . .

 New York Daily News, by Michael Daly, August 19, 2011:

“When you remember Moira, you hold onto what is most dear

New York City Police Officer Moira Smith – the only female officer among the 23 NYPD cops who died on 9/11 – led stunned and bleeding people from the twin towers – only to run back in and perish with so many other heroes in the effort to rescue more. Her daughter Patricia Smith was two years old when her mother died. Now 12 she said, “To everyone, it’s been 10 years. It seems like five.”

“From two to 12.”

Patricia Smith was using her age to measure the passage of time since 9/11 and the murder of her uncommonly heroic mother. “To everyone, it’s been 10 years,” observed the daughter of Police Officer Moira Smith. “It seems like five.”

That was surprising coming from a 12-year-old, for it had been virtually her whole life since that day her mother led stunned and bleeding people from the twin towers – only to run back in and perish with so many other heroes in the effort to rescue more. I had last seen Patricia when she was 2, striding across the stage at Carnegie Hall with her father at the NYPD’s medal ceremony after 9/11. She was wearing a red velvet dress and shiny black shoes as she received the posthumous Medal of Honor on her mother’s behalf. The eight-pointed star was on an emerald green ribbon. My clearest memory is that she was so small it hung just above her knees.

Now, she sat with her father at the Il Vagabondo restaurant in Manhattan, nearly a teen, wearing a light blue V-neck T-shirt, a smart phone seemingly attached to her hand. A blue bracelet on her wrist might have been mistaken as a tween fashion accessory were it not for the inscription: “P.O. Moira Smith 9/11 Never Forget.” Not that she and her father, retired cop Jim Smith, ever would or could forget. When you remember Moira you hold onto what is most dear in the opposing tides of the receding past and the onrushing future. Never forgetting can indeed make 10 years feel like five, even when they extend back to the very start of your memories. Each of those years was marked by a solemn anniversary observance at Ground Zero, reminding Patricia of the lives her mother saved there. “It’s just good to be there and see what effect my mom had on people,” Patricia said.

On the wall above where Patricia sat was a framed photograph taken in this same restaurant of Moira holding her when she was not yet 1. Moira and Jim had made a tradition of coming to this Italian spot on St. Patrick’s Day to celebrate being Irish in the particular way of a couple who loved each other’s company best of all. “Eat Italian food, play bocce,” Jim said. The photo was taken on St. Patrick’s Day of 2000, the first after Patricia’s arrival had made the perfect pair a family of three. Moira beams with the excitement of all that seemed sure to come. That was also what she knew she stood to lose in the burning south tower a year later.

Happy 4th 2011!! WaPo’s EJ Dionne Challenges Tea Party Beliefs About the Declaration of Independence

July 4, 2011

Happy 4th!!  E.J. Dionne’s column today, What our Declaration really said, addresses two major beliefs of Tea Party political fundamentalists. Below is an excerpt from a column that’s well worth reading in full.

Whether they intend it or not, their name suggests they believe that the current elected government in Washington is as illegitimate as was a distant, unelected monarchy. It implies something fundamentally wrong with taxes themselves or, at the least, that current levels of taxation (the lowest in decades) are dangerously oppressive. And it hints that methods outside the normal political channels are justified in confronting such oppression.

We need to recognize the deep flaws in this vision of our present and our past. A reading of the Declaration of Independence makes clear that our forebears were not revolting against taxes as such — and most certainly not against government as such.

In the long list of “abuses and usurpations” the Declaration documents, taxes don’t come up until the 17th item, and that item is neither a complaint about tax rates nor an objection to the idea of taxation. Our Founders remonstrated against the British crown “for imposing taxes on us without our consent.” They were concerned about “consent,” i.e. popular rule, not taxes.

The very first item on their list condemned the king because he “refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.” Note that the signers wanted to pass laws, not repeal them, and they began by speaking of “the public good,” not about individuals or “the private sector.” They knew that it takes public action — including effective and responsive government — to secure “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”


Death in The Morning – Ernest Hemingway (1899-1961)

July 2, 2011

“Death hung like an obsessive shadow over the life and work of Ernest Hemingway. He was quoted as saying, ‘There is only one theme for a writer. That is death and its temporary avoidance, life.’” Oakland Tribune, July 3, 1961.  Fifty years ago, in the early morning at his Ketchum, Idaho ranch, Ernest Hemingway died by his own hand,  unable to anymore marshal the strength – mental or physical – to fight death to a draw.

He no longer dreamed of storms, nor of women,
nor of great occurrences, nor of great fish, nor fights,
nor contests of strength, nor of his wife.
He only dreamed of places now and of the lions.

The Old Man and the Sea (1952)

The mystery of the man was notorious:

The dignity of movement of an iceberg
is due to only one-eighth of it being above water. . .”

At the end, he walked to the end of the stream as singular in fame as he was alone. From Big Two-Hearted River:

“Ahead the river narrowed and went into a swamp. The river became smooth and deep and the swamp looked solid with cedar trees, their trunks close, their branches together. It would not be possible to walk through a swamp like that. The branches grew so low. You would have to keep almost level with the ground to move at all. You could not make your way through the branches. That must be why the animals that live in swamps are built the way they are, Nick thought.

He wished he had brought something to read. He felt like reading. He did not feel like going on into the swamp. He looked down the river. A big cedar slanted all the way across the stream. Beyond that the river went into the swamp.

Nick did not want to go in there now. He felt a reaction against deep wading with the water deepening up under his armpits. He did not want to hook big trout in places impossible to land them. In the swamp the banks were bare, covered with cedar needles, the big cedars came together overhead, the sun did not come through except in patches. In the fast deep water in the half light the fishing would be tragic. In the swamp fishing was a tragic adventure. Nick did not want it. He did not want to go down the stream any further today.”

Sarah Palin Commemorates [the Nearly] 100th Anniversary of D-Day

June 7, 2011

Sarah Palin took some time off from her One Nation bus tour today to commemorate “the one hundredth anniversary of the American invasion of Normandy beach during World War Two exactly one hundred years ago in our past history.”  At 11:00 am today, the former governor of Alaska looked eastward from Normandy Beach NJ and reflected to a New Jersey beach resort crowd:

“Today, June 7th, 2011, will always be rememberanced as the day when God fearing America planted its staff on this beach to warn the German Nazis that we were on our way, and that they better skedaddle away fast. By golly, they did. America was once again free of Nazis who then captured the country France, like that was a surprise. Today, as I look out at New Jersey’s beautiful Normandy Beach, now a gorgeous place of sun and fun, I thank God for those brave Americans who pushed Nazis into the nearby East River. And I thank those entrepreneurial Americans who rebuilt this lovely God-fearing beach into the top tourist destination it is today.” 

Mutt Demands “A Hint of Baked Apple”

 April 15, 2011

From the desk of Reginald Delano Roosevelt
April 15, 2011

Dear Winston,

AHEM . . . Sir

“Bone?!? You Expect Me To ‘Gnaw’ On A ‘Bone’?!  I sit upright, my good man. I wear a fez. I read Proust and Pynchon and giggle at the whimsical stylings of Fyodor Dostoyevsky. While you slave away for “the man” at your ludicrously meaningless donkeywork, my days pass in contemplation, yoga, bridge with the poodles down the street, and a dalliance with a ravishing little vamp of a Great Dane. Oh, and during your absences I sleep in your bed, oh yes, and quite soundly. So, in summation, you “gnaw” on the bone, sir, if you please. It suits you. Employ those overrated opposable thumbs.

As for my purpose in writing, it is once again regarding the matter of my daily meals. As you know we have fought long and repeatedly over this matter. I’ve often maintained – without rancor, mind you – your choice of nutrition for me borders on barbarous. Kibble I shall not nibble! My entreaties for the addition of a hint of baked apple in my so-called meals have long been unheeded. My warning remains in place since the last time I wrote you about this issue: Unless you immediately respond with action to my reasonable nutritional needs, I shall be forced, quite against my gentle disposition, to bring suit against you in a court of proper jurisdiction for compensatory and punitive damages.

We may, however, settle this amicably, still. Note that the fine canine nutritional company, Kibbles ‘N Bits, has long and successfully offered The Kibbles ‘n Bits Bistro Meals. These rich blends are offered in both Oven Roasted Beef Flavor and Grilled Chicken Flavor, each with a sophisticated mix of vegetables. And, for a palate as educated as my own, each blend features what I desire the most, a hint of baked apple! My associates in the neighboring residences are quite excited and as a result I have been ignominiously “mounted” on numerous occasions as a result. No harm done. Joy is as joy does. See Bistro Meals. Fetch. Good boy, good boy.

Your choice is clear. Endless litigation, or simple common sense. Picture my elation when you bring home my first Bistro Meal. Better this: Picture getting back your slippers, your various wallets, your “little black book,” your iPhone, your hairpieces, and your strangely alluring blow-up girlfriend.

With hopes for a congenial settlement of this endlessly pending matter, I remain, as always, your loving, though somewhat disgruntled, pooch, 

Reginald Delano Roosevelt

cc: Law Firm of Williams & Connoly
     A.S.P.C.A.
     P.E.T.A.
     My veterinarian

The Unnecessary Warfare Over “Pershing’s Last Patriot,” WWI Corporal Frank Buckles

March 4, 2011

I was never actually looking for adventure, it just came to me.”
Frank Buckles, the “Last Doughboy,” 2008 interview
The Associated Press

When you go to war as a boy you have a great illusion of immortality. . .” Ernest Hemingway, Men at War.  As you’ll read, Frank Buckles – World War One’s last doughboy – was adept at the kind of understatement in his quote above. In his remarkable 110 years, Frank Buckles made understatement his art form. Although, it’s true, he did slip up occasionally, like when he was 16 and overstated his age to enlist to fight in the Great War. But his claim that he was “not looking for adventure” is one of his more memorably conservative self-appraisals. And, beginning last week, “adventure” came calling again, despite his quiet passing in West Virginia on February 27th. Gone, Frank Buckles, U.S. Army Corporal, 1st Fort Riley Casual [unassigned] Detachment, in death, the last American to have served in the Great War, the War of the Nations, the “war to end war.”

To Corporal Buckles’ great disappointment, though, he never served on the front lines of the western front, but not for lack of trying: he once jokingly said, “Didn’t I make every effort?” The record bears him out. As an ambulance driver behind the lines in 1918, Buckles had been distant from the worst of the fighting in the Marne valley. With succinct understatement, however, he remembered, “I saw the results.” Perhaps underneath his modesty, he recalled much the same vision that inspired World War I poet Siegfried Sassoon, to write:

Do You Remember The Stretcher-Cases Lurching Back
With Dying Eyes And Lolling Heads–Those Ashen-Grey
Masks Of The Lads Who Once Were Keen And Kind And Gay?
Have You Forgotten Yet?…
Look Up, And Swear By The Green Of The Spring That You’ll Never Forget.

Insult and Injury. The unnecessary controversy continues over whether or not Frank W. Buckles, America’s last WWI veteran, ought to lay in honor in the Capitol Rotunda. It brings with it a bad taste, bordering on disgust. Our nation’s two congressional leaders are embarrassing themselves, and for no good reason. Since this began a few days ago, neither Speaker of the House John Boehner nor Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, both of whom must sign off on the proposal, have been forthright (or courageous) enough to explain their reasoning, if any. If they are invertebrates on something like this, so reliant on spokespersons to do their talking, to do their dirty work . . . well, it’s very un-Frank Buckles, to say the very least. If their attitude signifies a royal decree, perhaps they hope public distaste will fade as discussions of budgets, spending cuts, and Charlie Sheen’s return to tv this week. But I don’t think we ought to let Charlie Buckles down.

The Persistence of Memory.  Remember Mr. Speaker, your solemn words just four months ago Veterans Day 2010: “Today, we pause to pay proper respect to the heroes who have donned the uniform of our country and — along with their families — sacrificed so much so that we may enjoy the blessings of freedom.”

Reid’s negative position is difficult to understand as well. His record on veterans affairs is distinguished. The sight of Boehner and Reid digging in their feet on this when they can agree on almost nothing else is, to put it mildly, surprising, bordering on mysterious and foolish. There’s just got to be a principle or two lurking here, particularly since this issue is embarrassing to both leaders. Perhaps they don’t realize this? Considering their own silence on this, all we can do is speculate, and comment on some possibilities.

The “Not Just Anyone” Test. First, gentlemen, we all understand that “not just anyone” may be accorded the signal national tribute of lying in honor in the Capitol Rotunda. Agreed. No argument there. And in truth, I don’t believe this issue motivates Boehner or Reid, but it should. Surely Frank Buckles represents more than an individual. He represents the literal last soldier of a generation – the more than four and a half million U.S. WWI veterans, two million of whom served in combat on the killing grounds called battlefields of that unthinkably cruel war. From mid-1917 to the armistice on November 11, 1918, more than 115,000 Americans died, and nearly 400,000 were wounded standing duty as the German army launched their last offensive to win the war. As the final representative of that group of men and women, Frank Buckles, both the man and the icon, passes the “not just anybody” test with colors flying.

The Floodgate Test. Of course, there may be more requests for this illustrious honor. Yet, as far as precedent is concerned, should Frank Buckles be awarded this singular homage, how many others in future will be able to meet the very precedent Corporal Buckles would thereby set? Yes, in years to come, the last U.S. veteran of all our wars will pass away, from World War 2 to Korea to Vietnam to Persian Gulf to Afghanistan. Using the precedent of Frank Buckles, should he or she be allowed to lay in honor in the Rotunda, each too will indeed have a valid call on the same tribute based upon the “Frank Buckles precedent.” And, my larger point is, they ought to lay in honor, just as Frank Buckles ought to lay in honor, and each, in turn, set precedent for all who follow. It’s a precedent we all can live with.

As years grow into decades – and in Frank Buckles’ case, decades expanded to nearly a century – our nation needs reminders of a glorious past where courage overtook fear. The First World War brought carnage unthinkable in prior history, but within the expanding industrial revolution, horrors were unleashed with devastating weapons, munitions, tanks, and artillery; the subversion of chemistry and physics produced mustard gas, phosgene, and chlorine;  the elements themselves combined with trench warfare conditions to kill tens of thousands through exposure and disease; and let’s not overlook the often careless and craven leadership on all sides that sent thousands to their deaths in senseless charge after charge through barbed wire and mud directly into enemy machine guns and grenades.

Let The Memories Persist. The Great War is a war to be remembered, and often, and to the extent that Frank Buckles reminds us of the suffering and bravery and senselessness of the “war to end war,” he will serve as a learning moment for us all. It’s the kind of service Corporal Frank Buckles (1911-2011) undertook in 1918, and later in life as he stood often to propose a permanent WWI memorial in Washington, D.C. Laying in honor is an honor he would not have sought, but in his understated way, it’s one that “Pershing’s Last Patriot” would have quietly appreciated.

Tahrir Square – Honeymoon Hotspot

February 6, 2011

Let me not to the marriage of true minds
Admit impediments; love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove.
O no, it is an ever-fixèd mark
That looks on tempests and is never shaken;
It is the star to every wand’ring bark
Whose worth’s unknown, although his height be taken.
Sonnet 116, William Shakespeare

The Ballad Of Ahmad and Mona.
Married yesterday in Tahrir  Square.
15,000+++ in attendance.


File under “People in Love Do the Strangest, and Bravest, Things”

The Brilliant Life of Christina Taylor Green And “The Why Above All Whys”

January 11, 2011

“The whys of this story, why Johnny should have been struck just in that part of him that would have been most fruitful, why his clock should have been broken just at this particular time in his life,  . . . the why above all whys which is why any child should die, the whys and wherefores of the celestial bookkeeping involved, if any, I will not go into here.”
Death Be Not Proud, By John Gunther

On September 11, 2001, Christina Taylor Green entered a violent world on a violent day. Yesterday, nine years later, her brief life ended as it had begun, on a day of sudden violence. Unlike the day she was born, though, this day Christina was not sheltered safely in the arms of those who loved her, those who welcomed her. What were they thinking while gazing at the new life before them, distracted as they were by history unfolding in the destruction of the World Trade Center towers? Tiny Christina had just arrived as others were leaving, buried beneath megatons of rubble not too far away. Sudden violence and the deaths of innocents have always been with us. There’s no hiding from the chaos around us. Christina’s family knew that upon her arrival on 9/11; that day underscored the random and merciless choices that death often makes.

So, yesterday, in a Safeway parking lot, as amoral chance would have it, Christina Taylor Green, recently elected a member of her elementary school student government, sidled up to her Congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords, for a “meet and greet.” And there, within a few feet of her, Christina’s life ended in chaos purposely unleashed through the end of the barrel at the end of a string of declining fortunes of a madman, Jared Laughlin. Green attended Mesa Verde Elementary School. She was the only girl on the CDO baseball team – she loved the sport, as well as horseback riding and swimming. There are other criteria for measuring a life as well as its duration – quality and intensity, she exemplified that. She also, tragically, exemplified the bookends of violence so common in the world, born into violence, stolen away by it.